Category: Uncategorized

  • 5.11 starts selling tactical kilts again!

    So… I was afraid that Scruffy asking 5.11 to bring them back wasn’t another April Fools, and apparently it’s not.  5.11 is making tactical kilts again!  Yes, they have raised the prices by $10, but they are donating $10 to charity (heeeeyyyyy… I see what you did there…).

    As regular readers know, I’m a fan of kilts and ordered a couple of kilts from 5.11 the first time around.  Sadly, they did not arrive in time for Kilted to Kick Cancer, and I don’t have any pictures with me in one.  Of course, I do have a few shots of me wearing something from Utilikilts, and I thought I might share my thoughts on the 5.11 tactical kilt and compare them to Utilikilts.

    Of course, you do need to remember that the price difference between the two makes it similar to comparing a Buick to a Bugatti.  Sure, the Buick is a nice car, but…

    And, for the most part, that’s the way I feel about these two items.

    I have worn my two 5.11 kilts fairly often since I received them in September.  They have held up well, although I will state that I haven’t exactly been rough on them.  I also haven’t worn them to any cons simply due to them being fairly light weight and the weather just hasn’t permitted wearing them outside.  The fabric is pretty thin, but has been double layered and is either double or triple stitched at the seems, and the creases have been stitched in, so there’s no fear of losing them.  The cargo pockets have velcro closures.  While they are removable, there is no way to close the pockets while not attached to the kilt.  The snaps which are used to hold the pocket on as well as fasten the kilt are very secure.  Almost to the point of being too difficult to un-snap.

    I would say that the greatest fault of these kilts are the front slash pockets (unless you count the lack of rear pockets).  The front pockets go on the outside of your leg like a pair of pants.  To accommodate that, the angle of the actual pocket is straight down, which is a bit unnatural when you stick your hand into it.  I prefer the way that my Utilikilts are set up where the front slash pockets run to the inside of your leg.  First, this allows for obscene pocket space (I can pocket a full sized 1911 with ease).  Second, anything in your front pockets will naturally pull your kilt down between your knees instead of the other way around.  Remember that people should have to ask if you’re going regimental than being able to look and tell for themselves.  Having mentioned this in passing to MrsWizardPC while I was delivering WizardPC’s kilt for my wedding, she confirmed that she had a few skirts like that.  I believe this could simply be due to the designer normally designing pants and not thinking about it.

    After all that, here’s a quick breakdown on my comparison of the two manufacturer’s kilts.  I will use the Survival model of Utilikilt due to it being the most similar of models.

    Utilikilts are made in the USA vs 5.11 made in Vietnam.  Not sure how much that matters to you, but it does explain some of the cost difference.

    The Survival kilt uses one layer of a significantly thicker fabric vs two layers of thinner fabric on the 5.11.  There are ups and downs to both methods, but I prefer the single layer.

    The Survival kilt uses significantly more fabric.  This means a warmer kilt, and more pleats.  This means it tends to hang better in my opinion (and conceals bits when sitting better).  The 5.11 is damn near a pencil skirt for guys.

    The Survival kilt uses button closures for it’s cargo pockets vs velcro for the 5.11.  This is a personal opinion, but I like the snaps over velcro.  I’ve had a few times where I either didn’t have anything in the pockets or very little and had issue where one patch of velcro would let go, but not the other.  At which point I have to try to open the other without letting the first one close back up.  Good news is that it’s high quality velcro that grabs fairly aggressively.

    The removable pockets of the Survival can be closed when removed while the 5.11’s cannot.  The Survival’s pockets also have belt loops on the back in case you want to strap them to a belt or something.  Not sure the utility of that, but there you go.

    The Survival’s slit pockets go to the inside of the leg vs the 5.11’s going on the outside.

    The Survival has rear pockets vs. none for the 5.11.

    5.11 has mount points for a sporran (I use 5.11’s 6.6 pouch) vs the Survival having a key chain clip.  Both are useful, and having a sporran more than makes up for the lack of rear pockets.

    The 5.11’s buttons are significantly stronger than the ones used by Utilikilts.

    The Survival costs damn near 5 times what the 5.11 kilt does.  Yep… you read that right.  Remember my Buick vs Bugatti comparison?

    Final say:

    While not the best tactical/utility/modern kilt out there, the 5.11 is a great “starter kilt” for those out there that are curious about wearing one but balk at the price tag of something from Utilikilts, Alt.Kilt, or the others out there.  At $70, I’d recommend them.  Are the more expensive kilts out there that much better in my eyes?  Sure, but not everyone can/are wanting/should drop that kind of change for one.  Just like with firearms.

    Oh, and I would like the record to show that I never thought that I would write a blog reviewing clothes.

  • Oh… dear….

    So…. I’m guessing a certain goth bronie would be interested in this

    And knowing Voltaire, I’m certain that he’ll keep his threat promise to “write a song about Dischord from My Little Pony: Friendship is Magic” if he sells out of the run of Ponies of Doom in a month.  By the way, if you don’t know of Voltaire, he’s a damn good goth/folk/geek/humor musician… among other things.

    Oh, and appropriately enough, this meme directly followed his announcement in my Facebook feed:

    155795_496668920388364_1430604712_n

  • A couple good causes for you to throw some money at

    I feel kind of bad that I haven’t linked to either of these yet.  I’m going to claim that I’ve been too busy or something… not that I’m lazy or a bad person.  Yeah… that’s it.

    First up is Linoge’s fund raiser for HAVA.  It’s a good cause, plus holy crap the prize packages!  Seriously, I’ve seen fund raisers where the “first prize” wasn’t as nice as a few of those packages.  Be warned, the deadline for the drawing is tomorrow night, so I’d get on that.

    The other one is a bit more specific.  One of our fellow gun bloggers, Squeaky, is having a rough time financially and is being hit with some nasty medical costs on top of that.  She is at the point that she’s asking for some help.  I think Erin does a better pitch as to why you should help her than I could.  Oh, speaking Erin, she’s promised to do another “glockenponie” post if the goal is met… which I’ve been told is pretty close to happening.

  • Well, they got the name right…

    *disclaimer: the following is merely my opinion based on the reports of one of the interested parties in the story.  This opinion may or may not be shared by WizardPC, and should not be construed as anything beyond one man’s opinion.  By the way, if by some strange circumstance, someone would like me to test and evaluate their equipment after reading this, let me know.  Buying the stuff I review is pretty expensive.*

    So, it looks like Linoge got to test and evaluate one of US Firearm’s new ZiP guns, and things did not go well at all.  You can read his write up here.

    Initially, I was eager to read a review from him about this weird little new firearm.  Like him, there’s something inside me that attracts me to unusual designs.  This one is about as quirky as it gets with modern firearms.  It’s a .22 pistol that uses Ruger 10/22 mags.  The magazine not only is used to feed the rounds into the chamber, but also as the hand grip.  The creators also designed it with the idea of attaching it to a rail under a long gun.  I’m not sure what practical use having a small .22 slung under your rifle or shotgun would give you, but there you go.

    First up, that lovely 25 round BX-25 magazine that you see sticking out of the ZiP gun on their website and other promotional materials?  Yeah… don’t use those.  Well, unless you’re willing to buy their modification parts to mod the “BX-25 magazine you already own.”  So, the magazine that they designed the gun around won’t work with their gun unless you modify it, but they advertise that it will work anyways.  This throws up a red flag in my book from the get go.

    As per Linoge’s write up, he unboxed it, examined it, and took it to the range with 5 different brands of .22 ammo.  Apparently it only like one brand out of those 5 and would consistently choke on the rest of them (mostly stove pipes).  While a couple of the brands used were cheap bulk ammo labels, one of them was CCI MiniMag.  As a fellow blogger has stated recently, if it’s not working with CCI MiniMag, it’s broken.

    The thing that has really set off alarms  is that the gun fired not once, but twice out of battery.  After those incidents, he packed up and went home with the intent of calling the manufacturer.  He also was able to reliably reproduce the hammer falling with the pistol significantly out of battery.

    And then the really, really scary part.  The CEO of US Firearms, Douglas Donnelly first blamed the ammo for the out of battery discharge.  I’ve shot a lot of bulk .22.  I’ve seen my fair share of failures to fire due to bad ammo.  I’ve never seen one spontaneously go off.  When questioned about the firing pin being allowed to drop when the gun is out of battery, apparently his response was “yes, it’s supposed to do that.”

    Just in case Mr. Donnelly is unaware, there have been gun manufacturers that have been sued out of existence for lesser design flaws.

    Mr. Donnelly also clarified that the reason for the other failures were due to either a. bad ammo, or b. the wrong spring being installed for the type of ammunition being used.  This is the first I’ve heard of someone needing to swap out a spring in a .22 depending on the ammo used, and the ammo being used in this case was, in my unscientific opinion, the most common type that it would see.

    So… to sum up, the US Firearms ZiP gun is a gun of questionable use, requires the shooter to swap out recoil springs depending on the ammo, and even then has a high likelihood of blowing up in your hand if you don’t check to make sure that the bolt didn’t properly close ever time.

    Do to this callous lack of concern of the safety of the end consumer, I don’t think I’ll ever touch, must less buy something from this manufacturer.  At least they named the gun properly.  Just like the items that that term originally referred to, it might work, and, if you’re lucky, it won’t blow up on you!

  • Ummm…. I think you’re doing it wrong…

    So… a buddy of mine posted this picture to his Facebook account:

    What's that in the chamber?
    What’s that in the chamber?

    At first I was confused why he was posting a picture of his HiPoint C9, then I noticed a bit of copper in the chamber…

    And then I saw his next post:

    Oh dear
    Oh dear

    Yep… round in backwards.

    The story to go with this is that he was clearing a jam using the technique of racking the slide with the ejection port pointed at the ground and his hand over the chamber to catch the jammed round.  He pulled one round out this way, but the slide wouldn’t return to battery and the gun failed to fire a second time.  Upon inspection, he saw this wonderful sight.  He was able to clear the round with a cleaning rod (while praying he didn’t hit the primer).

    His theory, which I agree with, is that the jam was a double feed.  Somehow, with the two rounds bouncing around while he was clearing it, one of the rounds managed to turn all the way around and find a comfy home in the chamber.  He’s currently planning on making use of the lifetime warranty that HiPoint offers due to the gun now jamming on him on a regular basis (he claims that it used to run like a top, but he’s put an awful lot of rounds through it).

    He’s blaming this particular incident on “a combination of geometry and operator … eccintricity.”

    *UPDATE* I was mistaken, the slide did fully cycle and the pistol was in battery with the round in backwards.  The operator didn’t notice the issue until the gun went *click* a second time, and pulling the slide back failed to eject the round.

  • Tin Foil Hat Time!

    The head of the Colorado Corrections Department was assassinated at his home last night.

    First thought? This is related to the magazine ban somehow.

    Upon further review? This is much more interesting.

    UPDATE: It appears the prisoner in the link above was affiliated with Anwar al-Awlaki.

    Al-Turki’s company holds the copyright to “The Lives of the Prophets,” a CD set of Islamic sermons that tell stories about Muslim prophets recorded by the U.S.-born radical cleric Anwar al-Awlaki, who was killed along with his 16-year-old son in a drone strike in Yemen in 2011.

  • It was an inside job!!!!

    Because one of my on-again-off-again hobbies is tracking conspiracy theories:

    [youtube http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2dvv-Yib1Xg&w=560&h=315]

    I love how close this video is to the real thing.

  • Fun with Headlines, 3-12-13 Edition

    Actual Headline: Dad finds loaded gun, ammo near MTSU campus
    Accurate Headline: Drunk finds Police Officer’s utility belt, complete with all equipment, in ditch.

    Actual Headline: House OKs Proposal To Cut Lawmaker Allowances
    Accurate Headline: Democrats can’t understand why Nashville Legislators shouldn’t get a hotel per diem.

    Actual Headline: Democratic lawmakers vote to replace longtime Nashville election commissioner Eddie Bryan
    Accurate Headline: Democrats fire 20 year political appointee after he votes to check the citizenship status of voters who recently immigrated