AR10 Mag Pouch for PMAG20 and PMAG25

So I did a thing and built an AR10. I bought the lower and about twenty PMAGs (a mix of 20 and 25 LR/SRs) in late October of 2016. You know, back when Hillary! was inevitable and before the Russians hacked the election. Or something.

Anyway, I built the lower into a 16″ AR10 in .308. Then I realized that I had all these magazines and no mag pouches, which isn’t really a big deal because it’s not like I’m humping a ruck through Tora Bora, ya know? I go to the range and back, and that’s basically my use case.

But, you know, the NorKs could EMP us and then what?! I’d be carrying my PMAGs in my pockets?

So I searched high and low to find a mag pouch that fits the PMAG25. I almost bought a set from Condor or somesuch, and it turns out that steel AR10 mags fit but the PMAGs decidedly do not.

The NRA Annual Meeting in Atlanta was upon us, so I decided to wait until then to find someone who made what I wanted.

Tada!

That’s the Tactical Tailor Fight Light 7.62 Double Mag Panel. Yeah, it says 20rd but those are PMAG25s in there. Works for both!

I figured I’d make my annual blog post be something useful for someone else.

Random gun pics are cool, right?

Presented without comment, the contents of a pistol case in my house the other day: a Coonan and a .45 HiPoint.

Yes, that is a factory paint job.

I… wow…

So, one of my seriously left leaning friends that is anti-gun posted the following picture with the comment “Not what I like to see at work……”

Me, being the smartass that I am, commented “The fact that both the definition for rifle and shotgun are wrong?”

To which she replied:

“Well, I wouldn’t know, I just see guns like that and all I can think is, “how many children could that gun kill before the police could arrive?” I just want there to be fewer of them around people who don’t play well with guns.”

So… apparently, she gets upset merely seeing pictures of guns on a page in the more sterile environment possible.

I knew that this level of hoplophobia existed, it’s just jarring to actually see it in action.

Well… that went differently than expected

Dennis at Dragon Leatherworks hosted the Second Annual East Tennessee Blogger Shoot this past weekend.  I’ll try to do a proper write-up of it soon, but I wanted to make sure to mention a couple things.

I actually went with the desire to shoot a little .32acp derringer and a Ruger LCR in .357mag.  Both of which I knew were going to be there.

My desire was to fire them and get the desire to buy them out of my system.  “The more you know about guns, the less you want a derringer,” and “no, you really don’t want a .357 snubby, just get the .38 and save some money” are statements I’ve heard many, many times.

Actually firing them has not done this.

Shooting the derringer just made me giggle and have a desire to keep feeding it.

The LCR with full power .357mag?  “I cast FIREBALL!”

I probably need help.

Whoop-de-freakin-do

So, apparently, everyone is talking about TN’s governor signing a bill into law that would make silencers legal here.

You’d think I’d be excited over this, but… meh.

The thing is that silencers were already legal here.

The previous state law stated that silencers were illegal, unless you were in compliance with the NFA.  Yes, it was an affirmative defense instead of “yup, it’s legal,” so, in theory, a cop could arrest you for owning a silencer, book you, and then you get to show a judge the paperwork, and he then lets you free.  To the best of my knowledge, this has never happened.  Pretty sure that just about all interactions have basically been “you got paperwork for that?” “Yup, right here!” “cool, thanks.”

The only positive I see is that, if the Fed actually passes the Hearing Protection Act, there will be no ambiguity over how TN would handle possession of silencers.  Of course, that’s a bill that hasn’t actually seen movement in the Senate since before Trump actually took office…

By the way, some news reports have stated that machine guns and short barreled rifles are illegal here.  Same thing applies to them.  If you have proof that you have your tax stamp, you’re cool.

Elio’s having problems. This is my shocked face.

Recently, I read that Elio was saying that it needed more money to make some prototypes, do testing, and actually start producing their nifty little car.

A lot more money.

Somewhere around the lines of $376 million.

For those of you that haven’t heard of Elio, they’re a company that was created in 2009 to produce a reverse trike car with a 55hp engine that should be able to reach a top speed of “over 100mph,” and a fuel efficiency of 84mpg highway (according to their site).  Currently, the base price is $7450.  They started taking pre-orders in 2013, with projected production in 2014… and then 2015… or was that 2016?  Maybe 2017… nope, 2018, and this time we mean it!

Oh, and the Louisiana parish that has helped secure them an old GM plant to produce these things is now starting to ask some very pointed questions.  Apparently, this company has been holding onto this plant for 3 years, and, after promising to add 1500 jobs to the area, there are currently 28 on the payroll.

I might have written this off as another start-up company that simply bit off more than it could chew, except it’s remarkably similar to another company in the 1970’s.  That company was the 20th Century Motor Company and the Dale.

If you’re not familiar with the Dale, Jalopnik has done a wonderful job of chronicling it here, as has Car & Driver here.  The quick description is that 20th Century Motor Company was setup to produce the Dale, which was supposed to be a reverse trike car that had a 40hp engine.  It would reach 85mph, see 70mpg, and cost $2k (a bit over $9k in today’s money).  The media at the time lapped it up, and even the Price is Right had it as a possible prize.

Of course, the entire thing was a scam.  The vehicle that was pushed onto the display floor on the Price is Right wasn’t a functioning vehicle, and it was discovered that the prototype that they used in many of their promos didn’t have a steering wheel, or a gas peddle, and the engine was actually from a lawn mower and wasn’t hooked up to the transmission.

The owner of the company fled with the money she had stolen from the company, and was eventually caught years later.  Oh, I think I forgot to mention that she was actually using a false name at the time, and was wanted on several money laundry charges.  It really is a fascinating story.

So… let’s check off similarities between the Elio and the Dale:

Both are three wheel cars in a trike configuration

Both claim to be able to squeeze great performance out of small engines (“>100mph”/85mpg/55hp vs 85mph/70mpg/40hp)

They’re not far from the same price, adjusted for inflation (starting at $7450 vs $9k)

Both started business during a gas crisis.  The Dale had the 70’s gas crises, and Elio was started when $4/gallon prices were not unusual.

Both set production deadlines that they weren’t able to meet.  The Dale saw many “delays,” and Elio has consistently pushed their production time back since 2014.

Both have taken in millions in both investment money and pre-orders with no working vehicles produced.  Yes, there are YouTube vids of people driving Elios, but you’ll notice that they all state that that prototype doesn’t have the engine that will be in the production vehicle.

Both are claiming to use parts from vehicles from other manufactures, but aren’t actually connected to those manufacturers (as far as I know).

I’m not saying that the Elio is absolutely a scam, and they will never produce anything, but that’s the way I’m leaning until they actually come out with something.

Uh oh…

Looks like Wizard has some explaining to do

Quick observation of NRAAM 2017

The theme to NRAAM this year was definitely “Suppress All the Things!”

When Ruger is showing off an integrated suppressor barrel, and half of the stuff Brownell’s has displayed has cans on them, you know that the industry is banking on the Hearing Protection Act passing.

I hope they’re right.

For those going to NRAAM next week.

You’re probably already aware of the bridge collapse on I-85.

Apparently, the southeast side felt left out, and I-20 decided it would be fun to randomly buckle upwards.

Atlanta traffic is “fun” when there isn’t major road issues.  Prepare for insanity.

Why I Don’t Carry a Dedicated Defense Knife

I think we’ve all seen or heard people advise folks that you should always carry a defensive knife that’s razor sharp and never use it as your EDC knife for opening boxes, etc.  I just don’t buy it.

First off, there’s a simple issue of carrying one more thing.  I already carry my gun, keys, phone, and multi-tool on my belt.  Add to that all the crap I carry in my pockets, and I really don’t have much space for another knife.  Of course, this is personal preference, and I’m currently carrying 5 knives between the lock blades, multi-tools, etc that I normally carry.

The major argument for a dedicated defensive knife is that you need to keep it as sharp as possible.  First off, this suggests that it’s ok to let your EDC knife become dull.  It’s easy enough to keep your EDC knife sharp.  Most of the time, all it really needs is an occasional session with a leather strop to stay damn sharp.

There’s also the fact a knife just doesn’t need to be that sharp to cut you.  Sure, a razor sharp knife is easier to cut flesh, but humans have been chopping each other up for millennia.  It was fairly common for soldiers to use whatever rock they found to vaguely sharpen their weapons back in the sword and shield days.  And that was with iron and steel, much less bronze or chipped stone.

Heck, I’ve seen folks argue that it’s actually better to use a duller knife as a weapon.  If you’ve ever been cut with a really sharp knife, you may remember never feeling the cut.  The idea is that a duller knife with tear at the skin more and make your attacker really feel it.  I know some folks that advocate the use of a serrated knife for this reason over a straight edge.

My last big thing is that you should know your knife.  One thing that’s hammered into your head in any martial art is that your weapon should be an extension of you.  It would make sense that the knife that you use every day for common tasks would become that way.  This isn’t necessarily true with a dedicated defensive knife.  Especially if the blade profile is significantly different for that EDC.  Something like a karambit requires serious training to become proficient in for that reason.

Am I saying that you shouldn’t carry a dedicated defensive blade and you’re stupid if you do?  No.  What I am saying is that, if you do, you might want to re-evaluate why you’re carrying it.  Maybe you’ll decide that you really don’t need to.  If you do decide to continue to do so, find someplace to get training.